Design

The Creative Process

By Karen | Published July 14th, 2011

One of the more fun aspects of working in advertising is participating in creative brainstorming sessions. While there’s always serious thinking and a back-and-forth flow of ideas going on, typically, there’s also equal parts laughter. So much so, that the people in the offices across the hall have been heard laughing for no other reason than that they hear us laughing — it’s a contagious response.

That’s the thing — we’re in this business because we love creating new ways to look at and to think about the world. We love playing with ideas. We love jamming. We love letting ‘er rip. We love going where no minds have gone befo… Well, you get the idea.

So, what’s the process? Process of Creativity When a client comes to us with a project, we start with looking at what their objectives are.  After the information gathering stage is complete, we get together and let the words, images, and ideas flow. Our job at this point is to riff with reckless abandon — no editing allowed. When the creative dump has run it’s course, then we start sifting, sorting, combining, discarding, and finally, selecting.

Our process can be structured or improvised, individual or group, planned or spontaneous, consciously executed or subconsciously percolated. The number of ideas generated tends to be a function of the amount of time the client gives us and the information we’ve gathered during the initial phase.

While it’s true that creativity can be sparked through a social process, you don’t need a meeting or an involved format to be creative. Just as often, our best ideas happen in the solitary space of our own minds working at our own desks. Really, just a brain, some desire, and some time are all that are required.

So, if you have a desire to express your creativity in some way, don’t let yourself be hampered by anybody else’s rules. Just grab hold of an idea that fascinates you and do what this guy did.

What’s Possible When an Ad Agency Can Run Wild with Creative

By Karen | Published April 27th, 2011

We understand that not all clients have unlimited budgets or the freedom to say to an agency, "Surprise us. Sky's the limit!" 

BBDO was one such lucky agency.  For their AT&T “Hands” campaign, they hired artist Guido Daniele from Italy to elaborately paint and position human hands to portray iconic images signifying various countries around the world. The results are dazzling posters that pull viewers in, while conveying AT&T’s brand messaging of having the best worldwide coverage. 

Following are some of my favorites. 

  

India

att phone ad India

  

Bahamas

 

att phone ad Bahamas

 

 Australia

 
Creative ad for ATT phone

  

Canada

 
Ad for ATT phone for Canada

  

Egypt


 
  Att Egypt phone ad

  

Costa Rica

 
Att Coverage Ad Costa Rica

  

China
 

ATT phone coverage China Ad

  

England
 

 ATT coverage England Ad

 

Mexico

 
ATT Mexico Coverage Ad 

Click to view the full campaign

Just Because You Can, Doesn’t Mean You Should. Or Why I Hate Flash Websites.

By Karen | Published April 12th, 2011

Use Flash with CautionRecently, I was doing a  website competitive analysis for a new client. During my research, I came upon a site where the developer was clearly very successful in selling his client on the "More is Better" model. I mean this site opened with a Flash intro and Jazz music blaring and too-clever-by-half navigation—and I couldn't get out of there fast enough! Really, the only thing I hate on websites more than suddenly blaring music is a Flash intro that loads about as fast as sludge flowing uphill.

Don’t get me wrong, there are some great uses for Flash—where would gaming, video, and other high media content sites be without it. But for your average business site? Not usually. Too often, designers use splash pages to impress their clients with eye-candy. And, too often, those clients don’t know about site loading times, usability, SEO, or mobile touch screen issues ("iPad" anyone?) to know that generally this is a bad idea.

Rather than “out” the local business website that triggered this post, let me just use Nike as an example. In this case, the Flash loads relatively quickly, and is done very well, but it makes navigation really cumbersome. Give the site a whirl and see how long it takes you to X out. If there are other things you want to get done today, my money's on less than a minute.

From the user's standpoint, here's the problem with Flash intros or any non-text landing page: When people come to your website, they're looking for actual information, and because they're busy, they want instant access to your content. Instead, they find a slow loading, fancy Flash intro with flying text and perhaps booming bass blaring. (Interesting how many Splash pages also play music.) In the midst of this assault to their senses, they have to figure out where the "Skip Intro" link is. I can assure you that unless you're offering a one-of-a-kind, can't-get-it-anywhere-else item or information, you've just lost a potential customer.

Overly used or inappropriate Flash pages aren't just a buzz kill for your visitors; Google hates them too.  Here's what comes up in a Google Search for another local agency (with a web department that should know better) with a Flash intro that Google attempted to index.

Google has trouble indexing Flash sites

I've altered the URL and description to protect the guilty, but the point is that since there is no content to index on the home page, Google grabs the Flash loader. Not good.

I'm not saying never use Flash; just think three times before you do. If you care about your visitors, and about SEO—and you should, unless you don't want search engines finding your site—forego the Flash and Splash and Music, and the rest of the whiz-bang stuff. Instead, focus on useful content and keywords, and Google will reward you with appropriate organic searches that will successfully drive visitors to your site. After all, isn't that the reason you've invested in having a presence on the web?

No Go On The Logo

By Andrew | Published January 24th, 2011

Parents are not what they used to be. A generation ago, they were strong authority figures, comfortable punishing transgressions with a paddle. Over the past few decades they’ve become more like friends to their children.

The trend towards mutual respect and understanding (at least on the part of parents) is, doubtless, a healthy one. It also has its drawbacks. The loss of parental authority can make it seem at times like the lunatics are running the asylum.

Which finally brings me to a thought provoking article about corporate logos in the January 15 edition of The Economist.

Companies are not what they used to be. A generation ago, they were strong authority figures… Apparently, now, there are companies out there who would like to change their logos, but their most vocal customers won’t let them. Two examples are Gap and Tropicana. Presumably both spent quite a bit of money and time coming up with new looks for their logos, only to have the outcry over the changes become so loud that they abandoned their new designs altogether.

One reason this happened it that these companies have “friended” their customers. They’ve said that they really and truly do care what their customers think, and openly have asked for their opinions on all kinds of matters. (But maybe not logos.) And their customers have vociferously weighed in.

The Economist offers a few explanations for this outcry:

  • Some people just need to get a life.
  • Some new logos are just plain dumb.
  • Sometimes a comfortable familiarity is much more important than being snappy and new.

The news tag on this article is the plan Starbucks has to change its logo this spring. The drumbeat against the change has already begun. It will be interesting to see if Starbucks pushes forward or abandons its plans.


Why Web Developers Hate Internet Explorer

By Karen | Published January 10th, 2011

.
In this case, two pictures are worth several thousand words..

Why We Hate Internet Explorer 6

Not all web browsers are created equal. Well, most all of them are, except for Internet Explorer. That’s because Microsoft doesn’t feel the need to follow the standards set by the World Wide Web Consortium, while just about everybody else does.

“So what?” you might ask.

For those of us who design web pages, that means we have to find a hack or or wind up redesigning just to make a template work in Explorer. The “So what” is that this winds up costing our clients extra money they shouldn’t have to spend for extra work we shouldn’t have to do.

For the sake of the sanity of all web developers everywhere, if you are using IE7 or even IE8 we implore you — UPGRADE TO IE9!  (It goes without saying that nobody but nobody should be on IE6 anymore.”

Or better yet, BOYCOTT EXPLORER  and SWITCH TO CHROME OR FIREFOX!

There, I feel better now.

That’s all for this public service announcement.